Lesson 5: Naming Conventions

  1. Objectives
  2. Order-Rank Naming
    1. Colors
      1. Latin
      2. Greek
    2. Body Parts
    3. Shapes
    4. Other Descriptors
    5. Common Animals
  3. Decolonizing Names
  4. Vocabulary list
  5. Vocabulary Practice
  6. Reflection Questions

Objectives

  1. Provide more context for how organisms are named
  2. Become familiar with common bases in naming

Order-Rank Naming

In the previous lesson, we saw how each living organism is classified according to the order-rank system. Aside from the genera that are named after people, most of the ranks will be able to tell you something specific about the organisms in that group. In most cases, any Latin or Greek forms will be left as close to the original languages as possible. The ranks are meant to be descriptive and somewhat intuitive for the biologist decently-versed in Latin and Greek roots. The following are some tables for roots commonly found in many scientific names. (Some of these have appeared in other lessons already!)

Colors

Color words from both languages are used in scientific naming, hence the two tables. Most of the same colors are represented, but there are some which are unique to their own language.

Latin

Root Latin form Meaning
alb albus/alba white
rub/ruf ruber/rubra/rufus/rufa red
nigr niger/nigra black
cyan(o) cyanus/cyana blue
flav(o) flavus/flava yellow
candid(o) candidus/candida bright, white
virid viridis green
pall(i) pallidus/pallida pale

Greek

Root Greek (transliterated) form Meaning
leuk/c leukos/leuke white
erythr(o) erythros/erythre red
melan(o) melas/melanios/melane black
xanth(o) xanthos/xanthe yellow, gold
chrys(o) chrysos/chryse gold
phoenic(o) phoenicos/phoenice crimson, bright red
rhod(o) rhodos/rhode pink, rosy
glauc/k glaucos/glauce grey, silver
chlor(o) chloros/chlore green

Body Parts

Most of these words refer to parts of the body which are not internal organs.

Definition Latin form Greek form
eye ocul ophthalm, opt
ear auric(l) ot(o)
nose nas rhin(o), rhynch
mouth bucc(a) stom(a)
beak rostr rhamph(o)
tooth dent odon(t)
head caput/capit cephal(o)
hair/fur capill(a) trich(a)
neck coll(o) trach(el)
back dors(a) plat(e)
stomach/belly vent(r/er) gast(r/er)
wing/fin ala pter
foot pes/ped pod/pus
tail caud ur

Shapes

Some scientific names describe a particular feature of the organism using a familiar shape. These roots are typically found in compounds with other roots and do not often stand on their own.

Root Language of origin Meaning
actin Greek ray (like the sun)
onco Greek mass, bulk
sem(a/o) Greek flag, banner
lepid(o) Greek scale (as of a fish)
cole(o) Greek sheath
theca Greek case
scut(a) Latin shield
squam(a) Latin scale (as of a fish)
bulb Latin onion, onion-like
set(a) Latin bristle
flor(a) Latin flower
stri(a) Latin groove, stripe

Other Descriptors

Root Language of origin Meaning
platy Greek flat
brachy Greek short
acr(o) Greek high, tall
tachy Greek fast
brady Greek slow
ambly Greek dull
carchar Greek sharp, jagged
long Latin long
brev(i) Latin short
parv(o) Latin small
magn(i/o) Latin large
alt(o) Latin tall, deep

Common Animals

Because Latin was so widely used in science at the time that taxonomies were being developed, animals which were commonly seen across Europe have their names taken from the literal word for that animal in Latin. Here are some examples.

Animal Latin name
dog canis
cat feles
bird avis
fish piscis
horse equus
bee apis
wolf lupus
fox vulpes
bear ursus
lion leo
snake serpens
eagle aquila
monkey, ape simia

Animals which take their genus or species name after a human or geographical name will usually have names that end in -a, -us, -is, -ense, or -um.

Decolonizing Names

In November of 2023, the American Ornithological Society announced that it would change the English names of every bird that was named after a person, or whose name was deemed offensive or outdated. Examples include Lewis’ woodpecker and Steller’s sea jay. This decision reflects a broader trend in the scientific community to reassess the legacy of colonialism and the implications of naming practices that have historically marginalized certain groups. By renaming birds like Lewis’ woodpecker and Steller’s sea jay, the AOS aims to create a more equitable framework that respects the diverse cultures and histories associated with these names.

The practice of naming species after individuals often stems from colonial-era traditions, where explorers and scientists would commemorate their discoveries by attaching their own names or those of their contemporaries to new species. However, many of these names have become problematic over time, as they can glorify figures whose actions contributed to oppression or whose legacies are contentious. The renaming initiative seeks to remove these associations, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of biodiversity that does not rely on outdated or harmful narratives. By adopting names that celebrate indigenous cultures, reflect local knowledge, or are simply more accurate for the species they describe, the AOS is fostering a sense of belonging and respect for the communities that have historically been sidelined in scientific discourse.

The same shift has been harder to see in scientific names that follow the Linnaen system, since most names are given to represent specific characteristics of a particular organism. However, as we saw in the last lesson, there are still many organisms that bear people’s names. Loeflingia, named for one of Linnaeus’s students, is a genus of bristly plants in the carnation family (Caryophyllaceae). Unless the naming of the plant had something to do with Pehr Löfling’s personality, it’s difficult to see how the name is supposed to describe the organism.

In reality, scientific names rarely change, and when they do, it tends to be for physiological and biological reasons, such as reclassifying an organism into a different genus. For example, the Giant Panda was originally classified in the Ailuridae family (raccoons), but was later found to be genetically different enough from raccoons to constitute their own family, the Ailuropodidae.

However, the movement to decolonize common names is gaining traction and prompting discussions about whether a similar reassessment of scientific names is warranted. As awareness of the implications of colonial legacies grows, there is increasing pressure on the scientific community to consider the historical context of naming practices. While changing scientific names poses challenges—such as the need for consensus within the taxonomic community and the potential for confusion among researchers—it also presents an opportunity to align scientific nomenclature with contemporary values of inclusivity and respect for local and indigenous cultures.

Furthermore, engaging with this discourse might encourage a more holistic approach to naming that recognizes the importance of indigenous knowledge and cultural significance in the context of biodiversity. By fostering dialogue around these issues, scientists can work toward a more equitable framework that not only respects the organisms themselves but also the communities that have long been connected to them. Ultimately, the movement to decolonize names—both common and scientific—has the potential to reshape how we understand and interact with the natural world, reinforcing the idea that science is not only about classification but also about the stories we choose to tell and the values we uphold.

Vocabulary list

Root Language of origin Meaning Example
leuk/c Greek white leukemia
erythr(o) Greek red erythrophobia
melan(o) Greek black melanin
xanth(o) Greek yellow, gold xanthosis
chrys(o) Greek gold chrysalis
phoenic(o) Greek crimson, bright red phoenix
rhod(o) Greek pink, rosy rhododendron
glauc/k Greek grey, silver glaucoma
chlor(o) Greek green chlorophyll
actin Greek ray (like the sun) actinost
onco Greek mass, bulk oncologist
sem(a/o) Greek flag, banner semaphore
lepid(o) Greek scale (as of a fish) leprosy
cole(o) Greek sheath coleoptile
theca Greek case apothecary
platy Greek flat platypus
brachy Greek short brachyodont
acr(o) Greek high, tall acropolis
tachy Greek fast tachyon
brady Greek slow bradylogia
ambly Greek dull amblyacusia
carchar Greek sharp, jagged carcharias
alb Latin white albino
rub/ruf Latin red rubella
nigr Latin black nigrescent
cyan(o) Latin blue cyanide
flav(o) Latin yellow flavin
candid(o) Latin bright, white candid
virid Latin green viridian
pall(i) Latin pallidus/pallida pallor
scut(a) Latin shield scute
squam(a) Latin scale (as of a fish) squamous
bulb Latin onion, onion-like bulbous
set(a) Latin bristle setaceous
flor(a) Latin flower floral
stri(a) Latin groove, stripe striated
long Latin long elongate
brev(i) Latin short brevity
parv(o) Latin small parvovirus
magn(i/o) Latin large magnitude
alt(o) Latin tall, deep altitude

Vocabulary Practice

Practice Set A. Based on the table of Latin animals, tell what animal each term relates to.

  1. apiary
  2. canine
  3. equestrian
  4. aquiline
  5. Pisces
  6. feline
  7. aviator
  8. serpentine
  9. simian
  10. Ursa Major

Practice Set B. Identify the roots in each of the following words, give their language of origin, and their definitions. Then, following the guidelines in Lesson 4, arrange the definitions of the individual roots to create a literal definition.

  1. piscivorous
  2. capillary
  3. dorsal
  4. inoculate
  5. Rhamphorhynchus (an extinct flying reptile)
  6. cephalopod
  7. platypus
  8. macrodontia
  9. ventral
  10. rhinoceros (Hint: you may find one of these roots in Project 1)

Reflection Questions

  1. Which of these roots were familiar to you? Which were not? In what contexts have you seen them?
  2. Look ahead to Project 1. Where do you see some of these terms appearing? (Name at least 3 instances)
  3. In your opinion, should the same effort to remove human names from common names be applied to scientific names? Why or why not?